Charles’ double hit on Harry in hours – after refusing to see him, he ‘stole’ a title

Charles’s royal disdain for Prince Harry, as the King refused to meet his young son. This was not the only blow that his royal father directed at Prince Harry.

Some say Charles struck a double whammy against his youngest son in the space of just a few hours, perhaps his toughest yet. Because, according to others, it is another general expression of support for duty as a higher obligation.

However, many in Britain comment on this double blow from Charles.

The first strike came at midday and was revealed by Prince Harry’s spokesman. Shortly after the prince’s arrival in London, his spokesman revealed that he would not meet his father due to his busy schedule. In general, Charles told Harry that he had no time to see him.

The second blow came late in the evening when the Palace announced that King Charles would attend a joint engagement with William next week, where Prince William will become Colonel-in-Chief of the Army Air Corps.

Before Prince Harry retired from royal life four years ago, there was always speculation that he would become a lieutenant colonel in the Air Force, taking command of the regiment he was with in Afghanistan.

The announcement that the king would hand over the role he has held for 31 years to his eldest son came just two hours after he said he was too busy to see his younger son.

Charles’s double disdain for Harry

A person familiar with what is going on behind the scenes of the palace said, according to what was reported by the Daily Mail, that “timing is everything,” while another, also according to the British newspaper, said that the king’s decision not to see the Duke of Sussex during his visit to London “will be viewed widely.” Broadly defined as contempt.”

Father and son were spotted a short distance away in London yesterday, with Harry in an artillery company, while Charles was first at Clarence House and then in Buckingham.

Michael Cole, a former BBC royal correspondent, said: “This is disrespectful. The fact that the king did not see his youngest son, Prince Harry, even though the distance between the two men was three kilometers, indicates the depth of the bay.

The “prodigal son” is not welcome – at least for now. Prince Harry certainly sees it for what it is, which is the clearest and strongest indicator of the pain he has caused. Actions have consequences, but we rarely see them as clearly and forcefully as we do now.

Even Prince Harry is sure to get the message and many will say: ‘It’s about time.'”